The Letokhov-Lawandy (Anti-Stokes) Effect
and the Patterson Effect
The first two effects (Letokhov-Lawandy effect and Patterson effect)
are both cases of what is referred to as the Anti-Stokes Effect.27
In the Anti-Stokes effect, the medium outputs more energy than the stimulation
contains that one introduces. Classically, the remainder of the output
energy is assumed to come from molecular transactions, etc.
However, Lawandy with TiO2 particles and Patterson with palladium-clad
microsphere capacitors have added (1) an array of Poynting generators to
the normal fluid medium, (2) iterative retroreflection of the Poynting
energy, and (3) multipass, multiple collection of energy from the multipassed
S-flows. These extensions to the anti-Stokes effect caused the present
author to name the TiO2-type case the Letokhov-Lawandy effect,
and to name the charged beads-type case the Patterson effect. In each case,
there has been highly significant augmentation of the basic anti-Stokes
effect to warrant naming it as a new effect of its own. In addition, either
the Patterson case or the Lawandy case can also involve a quantum potential,
which has not previously been even conceived of in conjunction with the
anti-Stokes effect.


See Figure 30 and Figure 31. The Letokhov-Lawandy effect
and the Patterson effect recover their excess emission energy directly
from the vacuum energy exchange. They utilize iteration of both retroreflection
and collection. Iterated, multiple collection of energy from the same Poynting
flow occurs. In addition, an exponential positive feedback effect also
occurs: As the multipass, multicollection process increases the local (collected)
energy density, in turn that increases the magnitude (energy density) of
the local scalar potential, increasing the E-field accordingly.
In turn, that increases the Poynting energy flow, which further increases
the amount of energy collected in each pass of the S-flow over a
collector particle (Lawandy) or bead (Patterson). This positive feedback
continues until stabilized at some level determined by the increasing rate
of escape by multiple scattering actions from the perimeter of the collectors.
The Quantum Potential As A Direct Energy Amplifier
The Patterson device and the Lawandy device also can partially
utilize a quantum potential, which power engineers presently know
zilch about, and which most physicists know very little about.28
The degree of susceptability to initiating a quantum potential (QP) is
a function of the phase conjugate reflection activity produced by each
collector (particle or bead). Formation of a quantum potential adds a totally
new dimension to the energy collection: Once the QP forms, each collector
(bead or particle) has some fraction of participation in the overall quantum
potential. This means that the energy appearing at one station has a fraction
of its energy simultaneously and instantly appear at every other participating
station, and vice versa. The primary station does not "lose"
any energy in this transaction, because now the local space is partially
multiply-connected. In a multiply connected space, an object, field,
or amount of energy can exist simultaneously in two different, widely
separated, spatial locations (as seen by an external observer outside the
system.) In this case, to the external observer direct energy multiplication
occurs, which violates any "energy propagation" model of energy
transfer in a singly-connected space.
Nonetheless, overall conservation of energy is not violated when the
vacuum interaction is included. One is simply replicating the same ordering
(template) of the local vacuum, at multiple locations simultaneously. So
the excess energy arises from the local vacuum at each station (as seen
by the external observer). In the particular case, imperfections in the
quantum potential process limit the amount of direct energy amplification,
by limiting the degree to which a multiply connected space is achieved.
Also, as the multiple connections in space improve and energy amplification
rises, the distortion and instability of the multiple space connections
i.e., the degradation of what Wheeler called wormholes) increase
exponentially.
This provides a maximum, finite stability level so that the QP stabilizes
at a finite value, as does the energy amplification factor. Otherwise,
there would be no limit whatsoever to the amount of energy that
a quantum potential -- e.g., as in Lawandy's new form of lasing -- would
rapidly produce. In fact, if perfectly formed in a perfect, multiply
connected space, a QP would immediately produce a self-inflated "false
vacuum," and a great new "Big Bang", resulting in the creation
of an entirely new universe, separate from this one. Whether or not it
would utterly destroy this particular universe is a matter of conjecture.
Fortunately, we need not worry about creating a new "Big Bang";
the normal processes allow the formation of only a fractional QP, with
rapid degradation and total clamping of the maximum energy level, for a
particular QP-generating process.
We published the mechanism for making a quantum potential some time
ago, obscurely in 1989 and later in a book, Gravitobiology, in 1991.
At any rate, the exposè of the use of multipass collection, negative
absorption by the medium, iterative retroreflection of scattered energy,
and the quantum potential as a method of enhancing energy collection in
overunity devices is planned for future articles.
The Fiber Fuse Effect

See Figure 32. The fiber fuse problem is presently
"unsolved" by conventional science (although Russell and his
colleagues are very close). However, it always produces more energy out
(by far!) than what one puts in to initiate it. The extraordinary thing
is that, even after the fiber fuse runs (at about a meter per second) the
length of a fiber optics cable and "destroys" it (even for many,
many kilometers), the physical damage -- holes blown in the core about
every centimeter or so -- can often be reversed by simply reversing the
laser light direction down the cable and re-initiating the fiber fuse from
the other end. The series of holes about every centimeter of so, down the
entire cable, will then often be refilled again with material, sufficiently
to restore a functional cable!
The Letokhov-Lawandy effect29 [Figure 30] and the
fiber fuse [Figure 32] are readily demonstrable by any university
lab (sophomore level). Patterson is proceeding toward commercialization
of his independently validated overunity approach. Presently
Lawandy seems focused on lasing; it remains to be seen whether or not he
will recognize the electrical power system implications of the effect.
I suspect that he will or has already, and that we will see Lawandy overunity
systems in our power future.
Other Surprises
In the future we will also acquaint the reader with a host of other
overunity or potential overunity effects, devices, and principles. We will
cover, e.g., (1) the Wiegand effect, (2) the Johnson multivalued potential
gate effect, (3) the Radus effect, (4) multi-kilowatt, parametric oscillating,
self-powering overunity generators produced in Russia in the late 1930s
and extensively published in the pre-war scientific literature, both in
Russia and in France, (5) Stanford's and General Electric's development
of true negative resistors (self-powering) in the late 1930s, under our
greatest electrical scientist, Gabriel Kron, (6) Westinghouse's loss or
abandonment of two major overunity processes, even after hardware was produced,
(7) multi-looped feedback, open systems that accomplish S-flow iteration
and multi-collection, (8) the use of the "missing half" of the
EM energy that is in our circuits as a highly damped but equal energy flow
down in the atomic nuclei, (9) the Sweet vacuum triode amplifier, (10)
magnetic flux path switching, (11) the unsuspected violent energy flows
produced by the human body, (12) the energetics energy flow of the Earth,
(13) linkage of human body energy flow into the overall energy flow of
the Earth, and (14) the surprising and previously unsuspected direction
emerging for future development of education, health, medicine, and engineering.
Summary and Conclusion


In one sense the summarized work over the last few years has been enormously
productive, at least in increased insight into electrical power and medical
therapy possibilities. As Figure 33 clearly shows, asymmetrical
regauging -- which the electrodynamicists themselves admit is free for
the taking -- will generate excess force, excess energy, and positive work.
On the other hand it has been most frustrating to have to work without
funding, and to have to watch helplessly as (1) so many millions continue
to die needlessly of dread diseases such as cancer and AIDS, and (2) the
energy-connected pollution of the planet and rape of our pocketbooks continues
apace. The funds spent by the U.S. Government in a single week on
cancer, AIDS, and energy would re-establish the entire Priore approach,
as well as develop a plethora of practical overunity systems, were those
funds focused on the extended hidden variable electromagnetics approach
that is represented by energetics. Figure 34 graphically characterizes
the real problem: As a nation, we still have our collective scientific
and medical and governmental heads in the sand, like the proverbial ostrich.
The ostrichlike attitude, "Pretend we don't see it, and maybe it
will go away!" can no longer be justified.
Nonetheless we continue to make slow progress. As new developments occur,
they will be shared openly with the reader here in Explore!, over
the InterNet as in The Virtual Times (http://www.hsv.com),
in books, in journal articles, and in other publications. This concludes
this four part series.
Notes and References
[Back to Top]